Fra:                                              Per Gunnar Linvik

Sendt:                                        13. september 2018 08:02

Til:                                               'Thomas Kruse Lie - Patrade A/S'

Kopi:                                           Lisbeth Kortegaard Ekström - Patrade A/S

Emne:                                        SV: Objection to yet another time-extension in OP2018/00186 and OP2018/00187 [ Vores ref.: O1187NO00/O1188NO00/TKL ]

 

Dear Thomas Kruse Lie

 

First, as stated below, your latest objections were not registered in our database at the time the last extensions were given. If we had received these beforehand, we would not have granted further extensions.

 

From the proprietors’ representative’s (Njord’s) request dated 2018.09.07, I got the impression that the parties once again are negotiating, and I deemed it reasonable to grant one final extension, especially since Njord had sent a copy of their request to your e-mail adress, and we had not (by 2018.09.10) registered any reaction from you. This is unfortunate.

 

I read the requests for a “final” extension from Njord as exactly that, and I have stated quite clearly in my letters dated 2018.09.10 that they will need to provide a written consent from you before they can request yet another extension. I can assure you, after your latest e-mails, that I will not grant further extensions without your consent.

 

 

Sincerely,

Per Gunnar Linvik
Senior Executive Officer
Telephone: +47 22 38 74 65 / +47 22 38 73 00
E-mail: pli@patentstyret.no

https://irgangen.patentstyret.no/Global/dokumenter/tjenester/E-post%20signatur/E-postsignatur_engelsk_2018.png

 

Fra: Thomas Kruse Lie - Patrade A/S [mailto:TKL@patrade.dk]
Sendt: 12. september 2018 14:48
Til: Per Gunnar Linvik <pli@patentstyret.no>
Kopi: Lisbeth Kortegaard Ekström - Patrade A/S <lke@patrade.dk>
Emne: Objection to yet another time-extension in OP2018/00186 and OP2018/00187 [ Vores ref.: O1187NO00/O1188NO00/TKL ]
Viktighet: Høy

 

Dear Per Gunnar

 

I hope everything is well.

 

I have just noticed that you have just decided to grant the owner yet another unilateral extension in the above referenced cancellation requests.

 

I have attached one of your decisions for your ease of reference – The other is identical to this.

 

I can’t help but notice, that our latest objections aren’t logged in your database, although we sent them quite quickly following the owner’s request and before your decision to grant the extension (attached here as well for your ease of reference).

 

To be quite frank, I don’t understand why you keep granting these unilateral extensions; You stated in the previous decisions to extend, that:

 

”Det vil ikke bli gitt flere fristforlengelser med mindre det på forhånd er inngitt samtykke fra motparten. Hvis vi ikke mottar svar innen fristen, tar vi saken opp til formell avgjørelse på bakgrunn av dokumentasjonen som finnes i saken.”

 

Obviously, we did not give our consent, and yet the extensions were given.

 

As stated in our objections, it is our clear opinion that the opponent is simply trying to stall the cancellation proceedings as long as possible.

 

As you might imagine, I would prefer if you could firmly insist on giving no more extensions, so that the matter can be concluded in due course instead.

 

I hope that you take no offense of my complaint above, and that you will be willing to give me an explanation – You are more than welcome to give me a call.   

 

Med venlig hilsen | Yours sincerely

Patrade A/S
Thomas Kruse Lie
Assistant Attorney

Østre Havnepromenade 26

Phone:  

+45 7020 3770

DK-9000 Aalborg

Direct:

+45 9879 5014

Denmark

Mobile:

+45 6019 7035

Aarhus            Copenhagen            Aalborg            Kolding

For IPR related news please visit www.patrade.dk or follow us on LinkedIn

The information in this email is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. If you received this by accident, please notify the indicated sender and delete it from your mailbox.